25 ஆக., 2010

ஈராக்:ராணுவம் வாபஸ் என்ற பெரும்பொய்

ஆகஸ்ட் 20 ஆம் தேதி அதிகாலை பொழுதிற்கு முன்பு ஈராக்கின் போர் களத்திலிருந்து கடைசி அமெரிக்க ராணுவவீரனும் வெளியேறியிருப்பார் என்று உலகம் முழுவதும் பரப்புரைச் செய்யப்பட்ட செய்தி அமெரிக்க அதிபர் பாரக் ஒபாமாவின் தலைதப்புவதற்கான முதல்தர அக்மார்க் பொய் என்பது வெட்ட வெளிச்சமாகிவிட்டது.

ஜனநாயகத்தின் பாதுகாவலர்கள் என்ற வேடமணிந்துக் கொண்டு அரை லட்சம் படைவீரர்கள் ஈராக்கின் பல ராணுவ முகாம்களிலும் ஆயுதங்களுடன் காத்து நிற்கின்றனர். இது போதாது என்று மேலும் 20 ஆயிரம் பேர் ஜனநாயகத்தை பாதுகாக்க ஈராக்கிற்கு செல்லவிருகின்றார்கள்.

சதாம் ஹுசைன் பேரழிவு ஆயுதங்களை ஒளித்து வைத்திருக்கிறார் என்ற பெரும்பொய்யைக் கூறி மெசபடோமியாவின் மண்ணில் அந்நிய ஆக்கிரமிப்புப்படையினர் காலடி எடுத்து வைத்தனர் என்பதால் அதிபர் ஒபாமாவின் இந்தப் பொய்யைக் குறித்து ஆச்சரியப்படத் தேவையில்லை.

எட்டு ஆண்டுகளுக்கு முன்புதான் தங்களது இலட்சியப்பணி பூரணமடைந்துவிட்டது எனக்கூறி ஒரு விமானத்தாங்கி கப்பலில் அமெரிக்க முன்னாள் அதிபர் ஜார்ஜ்.w.புஷ் எமகாதகனைப் போல் வந்திறங்கினார்.

தடை மற்றும் ஆக்கிரமிப்பினால் ஏறத்தாழ 10 லட்சம் ஈராக் மக்கள் கொல்லப்பட்டுள்ளனர். ஐந்து லட்சம் பேர்கள் அயல்நாடுகளில் அகதிகளாக அவதியுறுகிறார்கள்.

கொல்லப்பட்ட அமெரிக்க படைவீரர்களின் எண்ணிக்கை 4000 தாண்டும். ஆக்கிரமிப்பின் செலவோ கணக்கிடமுடியாத அளவுக்கு.

ஆண்,பெண் சமத்துவத்திற்கும், பொருளாதார சமத்துவத்திற்கும், கல்விக்கும் புகழ்பெற்ற ஒரு தேசத்தை பரிபூர்ணமாக தகர்த்ததில் அமெரிக்க பூரணமாக வெற்றிப் பெற்றிருக்கிறது என்றுக்கூற எவருக்கும் தயக்கமில்லை.

தேர்தல் என்ற கோலாகலத்தின் மூலம் வெற்றிப்பெற்ற கட்சிகளுக்கு கடந்த ஐந்து மாதங்களாக ஒரு அமைச்சரவையை உருவாக்க இயலவில்லை. அமெரிக்க ஆதரவு இல்லையென்றால் அதிபர் நூரி மாலிக்கிற்கு முன்பு ஈரானின் ஷா பஹ்லவி உள்ளதை சுருட்டிக்கொண்டு தேசத்தை விட்டு ஓட்டம் பிடித்தது போன்று செல்லவேண்டியது நேர்ந்திருக்கும்.

முன்பு முஸ்லிம்களாகயிருந்தவர்களை ஷியாக்கள், சுன்னிகள், குர்துக்கள் என பிரித்து மூன்று பிரிவினரையும் ஒருவரையொருவர் மோதவிட்டு நாகரீகத்தின் தொட்டிலை வன்முறைக்களமாக மாற்றியது அமெரிக்காவின் நன்கொடையல்லாமல் வேறென்ன?

ஈராக்கில் குர்த் பகுதியைத் தவிர வேறு எப்பகுதியிலும் வாழும் மக்கள் பாதுகாப்பாக இல்லை.

யுரேனியம் குண்டுகளை அதிகளவில் ஈராக்கில் வீசியதன் பின்விளைவாக புற்றுநோய் உள்ளிட்ட நோய்கள் அங்கு பரவிவருகிறது.

அபுகரீப் போன்ற சித்திரவதைசிறைகளை நம்பித்தான் நூரி மாலிக்கியின் ஆட்சி நிலைக் கொள்கிறது.

ஈராக் ஆக்கிரமிப்பு தவறான முடிவு என வாய்ச்சவாடல் விட்டு ஆட்சிக்கட்டிலில் அமர்ந்த ஒபாமாதான் தனது முன்னாள் அதிபருக்கு சற்றும் இளைத்தவரல்லர் என்பதை நிரூபித்து வருகின்றார்.

குவாண்டனாமோ என்ற சிறைக்கொட்டகையை மூடுவேன் என்பது ஒபாமா பதவியேற்றவுடன் கூறிய இன்னொரு பொய்யாகும். இவையெல்லாம் போர் எதிர்ப்பாளர்களான அமெரிக்க வாக்காளர்களை ஏமாற்றுவதற்கு பயன்படுத்திய தந்திரங்களாகும்.

நம்பிக்கையை அதிகப்படுத்தும் ஒரு ஆசுவாசமான செய்தி என்னவெனில், இரும்புக்கரம் கொண்டு அடக்கி ஒடுக்க பலமுறை முயற்சிச் செய்தும் ஈராக் மக்கள் அந்நிய ஆக்கிரமிப்பாளர்களுக்கு எதிராக போராட்டத்தை தொடருகிறார்கள் என்பதாகும்.

கடைசி அந்நியப் படைவீரன் ஈராக்கை விட்டு வெளியேறும் வரை போராட்டம் தொடரும் என்பதுதான் யூப்ரட்டீஷும் டைக்ரீஷும் நமக்கு தரும் செய்திகளாகும்.

விமர்சகன்

Digg Google Bookmarks reddit Mixx StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Buzz DesignFloat Delicious BlinkList Furl

5 கருத்துகள்: on "ஈராக்:ராணுவம் வாபஸ் என்ற பெரும்பொய்"

irainesan சொன்னது…

Kill a man, you are a murderer. Kill millions, you are a conqueror.” (Adolf Hitler)

If one were to substitute the word “conqueror” with “democracy” and the word “murderer” with “terrorist” that would render Adolf Hitler’s statements relevant to the political stand taken by liars like Tony Blair.

A million or more Iraqis murdered have been written off as “collateral damages” and this price, paid in blood was for the ‘privilege’ of having the US and UK forces dictating ‘democracy’ also known as ‘liberation’. The bloodbath is not described as murder or genocide or terrorism (state terrorism) but the non evocative term of “collateral damages”.

Such technical terms help to lighten the guilt making it more palatable for the masses to accept it as a by product of the foreign policy of Western Imperialism.

irainesan சொன்னது…

The Iraq Inquiry, led by former civil servant John Chilcot, is a hideous camouflage. It is a stage managed show to justify an open aggression and blatant intransigence of international law by the Western powers, particularly the US and UK.

Out of the five members of the inquiry’s committee, Martin Gilbert and Lawrence Freedman, were strong supporters of Tony Blair and the Iraq war. Both Gilbert and Freedman are Jewish, and that Gilbert has a record of active support for Zionism. So what would the Muslim world expect from such Zionists in the Iraq Inquiry Commission.

It is a fact that the campaign to overthrow Saddam Hussein was initiated, well before 9/11, by a group of influential American neo-cons, notably Perle, Feith and Wolfowitz (described by TIME magazine as "the godfather of the Iraq war") nearly all of whom were ardent Zionists, in many cases more concerned with preserving the security of Israel than that of the U.S. And Tony Blair served as a loyal and submissive poodle of President Bush.


Tony Blair’s testimony on 29th January 2010, showed to what extent he would go to deceive the world. He said he had no regrets over the killing of millions of innocent Iraqis. The price was worth.

He made an sinful and immoral statement at the Inquiry saying that even if Iraq was not possessing WMD, he would have helped Americans to invade Iraq. Look at his racist and colonial arrogance and vain- glory of the son of an ex-colonialist,

One True Almighty God warns through the revelation ( The Quran) as follows:

“HOW MANY A GENERATIONS WE HAVE DESTROYED BEFORE THEM, WHO WERE MORE IMPOSING IN RESPECT OF GEAR AND OUTWARD SEEMING” Sura 19 Mary: Verse 74.

“WE DESTROYED MEN MIGHTIER THAN THESE IN PROWESS”
Sura 43: Verse 8

LET POLITICIANS GO AROUND THE WORLD AND SEE FOR THEMSELVES, HOW MANY HUGE, EMPIRES THAT HAD BEEN MORE POWERFUL AND MIGHTIER ( than the present day America) HAD BEEN DESTROYED IN THE PAST BY GOD FOR THEIR ARROGANCE AND INTRASIGENCE.


Will it take too long for God Almighty to bring UK and USA to rabbles if they persisted in their arrogance and injustice. Are they greater than the Roman Empire or Pharaohs of Egypt? Where are they now?. Greedy politicians hardly learn lessons from history.

irainesan சொன்னது…

Americans who say that democracy and Islam can not co-exist and hence the US should promote democracy in countries like Iraq. This is a big deception.

It may be true that there are very many monarchies and dictators in the Middle East but that is nothing to do with Islam. It was historically Islam that introduced democracy to the world even 1400 years ago when the entire Europe remained barbaric and uncivilized. After the death of Muhammad, his successor was chosen by democratic means.

Many do not understand the American politics. America is the number one enemy of the promotion of democracy in the world. The Americans give a lot of lip service to democracy but covertly and overtly support the most fundamentalist, oppressive and un-Islamic rulers and kings in the Middle-East, because only then the modern day oil piracy can be effectively done.

For 30 years, one of the best friends of the USA has been the most horrible and oppressive ruler Husni Mubaruk of Egypt. So was Saddam Hussein when he was fighting a proxy war with Iran at the biddings of the US. Can an American politician explain why the US never talks about democracy in Egypt. Why the US bribes him to the tune of US$2 billion a year in order to keep him in power?


Dissidents of a regime at times do an excellent job in trying to help foreigners make plans to change regime by fair or foul means, this was what Ahmed Chlabi and Company did in Iraq against the oppressive regime of Saddam Hussein.

Undeniable that Saddam Hussein was a ruthless tyrant. but it is equally undeniable that Ahmed Chalabi and Company felt in their heart of hearts that their dissident activities and the successful regime change in Iraq devastated their nation, made millions of widows, orphans, refugees and destroyed a culture, religion, civilization.

They hated one man Saddam Hussein and now they hate their dissident conspiracy that has brought the people of Iraq to this most horrendous situation. Would Chalabi think that he never did what he did. Foreigners have a private axe to grind in any dispute that involves an oil producing nation.

irainesan சொன்னது…

There is a lose lose situation for democracies of poorer nations and win win situation for American and imbalanced Western industrial and capitalists.

A national may become a full fledged democracy as that of 1953 Iran where a legitimately elected democratic Govt came to power under the Prime Minister Mussadiq but since he was trying to change the oil policies Chavez is doing in Venezuela, Iran’s democratic was branded as a communist by the CIA and the CIA plotted and overthrew Iranian democracy and put back the most repressive, corrupt, drunkard and womanizer Shah in power.

Obama was honest in accepting this fact and apologising to Iran for the dirty job done by the CIA in 1953 in Iran. After 26 years of horrible and dictatorial rule by Shah, a people’s revolution overthrew Shah but this made the US nervous again and so another CIA plot to change regime in Iran.

The US would love to see Iran ruled by a horrible and corrupt ruler like Husni Mubaruk of Egypt.

It is a well known fact that America loves juntas, dictators, aristocrats, tyrants, monarchs in power but Americans give tremendous lip service to democracy because it serves the international hypocritical image of America as the fighter for democracy .So the real criteria is not democracy but is the ruling clique’s readiness to be submissive to American political, economic and military arm twisting as Turkey, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Pakistan have been and still are

Muslim countries could have achieved the stability and security that you have talked about if they had not gone through about 200 years of brutal, aggressive, exploitative colonialism on their lands by the British, the Germans, the Italians, the Portuguese, the Dutch, the Spanish, the Japanese and others. The US which was against the traditional colonialism, looks in the eyes of Muslims the new colonial power that will go to any extent to maintain its huge share of the wealth, its people’s high standard of living and its dominant role in all issues in the world.

When it comes to ( 1) fighting wars,(2) in dominating the world politically, economically, militarily (3) in exploiting the oil reserves of the Middle East ( 4) in keeping the obnoxious military juntas, dictators, monarchs and tyrants in power in as developing countries as possible (5) in creating the exaggerated value for American dollar as the only reserve currency in the world: a huge myth,(6) in building the huge American empire and i general in foreign affairs there is absolutely no difference whether the Democrats are in power or the Republicans are in power. It makes absolutely no difference. Not even 10% of America Street understand or care a damn about their country’s deception in foreign policy issues.

irainesan சொன்னது…

There is a lose lose situation for democracies of poorer nations and win win situation for American and imbalanced Western industrial and capitalists.

A national may become a full fledged democracy as that of 1953 Iran where a legitimately elected democratic Govt came to power under the Prime Minister Mussadiq but since he was trying to change the oil policies as Chavez is doing in Venezuela, Iran’s democratic was branded as a communist by the CIA and the CIA plotted and overthrew Iranian democracy and put back the most repressive, corrupt, drunkard and womanizer Shah in power.

Obama was honest in accepting this fact and apologising to Iran for the dirty job done by the CIA in 1953 in Iran. After 26 years of horrible and dictatorial rule by Shah, a people’s revolution overthrew Shah but this made the US nervous again and so another CIA plot to change regime in Iran.

The US would love to see Iran ruled by a horrible and corrupt ruler like Husni Mubaruk of Egypt.

It is a well known fact that America loves juntas, dictators, aristocrats, tyrants, monarchs in power but Americans give tremendous lip service to democracy because it serves the international hypocritical image of America as the fighter for democracy .So the real criteria is not democracy but is the ruling clique’s readiness to be submissive to American political, economic and military arm twisting as Turkey, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Pakistan have been and still are


Muslim countries could have achieved the stability and security that you have talked about if they had not gone through about 200 years of brutal, aggressive, exploitative colonialism on their lands by the British, the Germans, the Italians, the Portuguese, the Dutch, the Spanish, the Japanese and others. The US which was against the traditional colonialism, looks in the eyes of Muslims the new colonial power that will go to any extent to maintain its huge share of the wealth, its people’s high standard of living and its dominant role in all issues in the world.
When it comes to ( 1) fighting wars,(2) in dominating the world politically, economically, militarily (3) in exploiting the oil reserves of the Middle East ( 4) in keeping the obnoxious military juntas, dictators, monarchs and tyrants in power in as developing countries as possible (5) in creating the exaggerated value for American dollar as the only reserve currency in the world: a huge myth,(6) in building the huge American empire and i general in foreign affairs there is absolutely no difference whether the Democrats are in power or the Republicans are in power. It makes absolutely no difference. Not even 10% of America Street understand or care a damn about their country’s deception in foreign policy issues.

கருத்துரையிடுக